let

The let declaration declares a block-scoped local variable, optionally initializing it to a value.

Try it

Syntax

let name1;
let name1 = value1;
let name1 = value1, name2 = value2;
let name1, name2 = value2;
let name1 = value1, name2, /* …, */ nameN = valueN;

Parameters

nameN

The names of the variable or variables to declare. Each must be a legal JavaScript identifier.

valueN Optional

For each variable declared, you may optionally specify its initial value to any legal JavaScript expression.

The destructuring assignment syntax can also be used to declare variables.

let { bar } = foo; // where foo = { bar: 10, baz: 12 };
// This creates a variable with the name 'bar', which has a value of 10

Description

let allows you to declare variables that are limited to the scope of a block statement, or expression on which it is used, unlike the var keyword, which declares a variable globally, or locally to an entire function regardless of block scope. The other difference between var and let is that the latter can only be accessed after its declaration is reached (see temporal dead zone). For this reason, let declarations are commonly regarded as non-hoisted.

Just like const the let does not create properties of the window object when declared globally (in the top-most scope).

An explanation of why the name let was chosen can be found in the linked StackOverflow answer.

Many issues with let variables can be avoided by declaring them at the top of the scope in which they are used (doing so may impact readability).

Unlike var, let begins declarations, not statements. That means you cannot use a lone let declaration as the body of a block (which makes sense, since there's no way to access the variable).

if (true) let a = 1; // SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context

Examples

Scoping rules

Variables declared by let have their scope in the block for which they are declared, as well as in any contained sub-blocks. In this way, let works very much like var. The main difference is that the scope of a var variable is the entire enclosing function:

function varTest() {
  var x = 1;
  {
    var x = 2; // same variable!
    console.log(x); // 2
  }
  console.log(x); // 2
}

function letTest() {
  let x = 1;
  {
    let x = 2; // different variable
    console.log(x); // 2
  }
  console.log(x); // 1
}

At the top level of programs and functions, let, unlike var, does not create a property on the global object. For example:

var x = "global";
let y = "global";
console.log(this.x); // "global"
console.log(this.y); // undefined

Redeclarations

Redeclaring the same variable within the same function or block scope raises a SyntaxError.

if (x) {
  let foo;
  let foo; // SyntaxError thrown.
}

You may encounter errors in switch statements because there is only one block.

let x = 1;

switch (x) {
  case 0:
    let foo;
    break;
  case 1:
    let foo; // SyntaxError for redeclaration.
    break;
}

A block nested inside a case clause will create a new block scoped lexical environment, avoiding the redeclaration errors shown above.

let x = 1;

switch (x) {
  case 0: {
    let foo;
    break;
  }
  case 1: {
    let foo;
    break;
  }
}

If you're experimenting in a REPL, such as the Firefox web console (Tools > Web Developer > Web Console), and you run two let declarations with the same name in two separate inputs, you may get the same re-declaration error. See further discussion of this issue in Firefox bug 1580891. The Chrome console allows let re-declarations between different REPL inputs.

Temporal dead zone (TDZ)

A let or const variable is said to be in a "temporal dead zone" (TDZ) from the start of the block until code execution reaches the line where the variable is declared and initialized.

While inside the TDZ, the variable has not been initialized with a value, and any attempt to access it will result in a ReferenceError. The variable is initialized with a value when execution reaches the line of code where it was declared. If no initial value was specified with the variable declaration, it will be initialized with a value of undefined.

This differs from var variables, which will return a value of undefined if they are accessed before they are declared. The code below demonstrates the different result when let and var are accessed in code before the line in which they are declared.

{
  // TDZ starts at beginning of scope
  console.log(bar); // undefined
  console.log(foo); // ReferenceError
  var bar = 1;
  let foo = 2; // End of TDZ (for foo)
}

The term "temporal" is used because the zone depends on the order of execution (time) rather than the order in which the code is written (position). For example, the code below works because, even though the function that uses the let variable appears before the variable is declared, the function is called outside the TDZ.

{
  // TDZ starts at beginning of scope
  const func = () => console.log(letVar); // OK

  // Within the TDZ letVar access throws `ReferenceError`

  let letVar = 3; // End of TDZ (for letVar)
  func(); // Called outside TDZ!
}

The TDZ and typeof

Using the typeof operator for a let variable in its TDZ will throw a ReferenceError:

// results in a 'ReferenceError'
console.log(typeof i);
let i = 10;

This differs from using typeof for undeclared variables, and variables that hold a value of undefined:

// prints out 'undefined'
console.log(typeof undeclaredVariable);

TDZ combined with lexical scoping

The following code results in a ReferenceError at the line shown:

function test() {
  var foo = 33;
  if (foo) {
    let foo = foo + 55; // ReferenceError
  }
}
test();

The if block is evaluated because the outer var foo has a value. However due to lexical scoping this value is not available inside the block: the identifier foo inside the if block is the let foo. The expression foo + 55 throws a ReferenceError because initialization of let foo has not completed — it is still in the temporal dead zone.

This phenomenon can be confusing in a situation like the following. The instruction let n of n.a is already inside the private scope of the for...of loop's block. So, the identifier n.a is resolved to the property a of the n object located in the first part of the instruction itself (let n). This is still in the temporal dead zone as its declaration statement has not been reached and terminated.

function go(n) {
  // n here is defined!
  console.log(n); // { a: [1, 2, 3] }

  for (let n of n.a) {
    //          ^ ReferenceError
    console.log(n);
  }
}

go({ a: [1, 2, 3] });

Other situations

When used inside a block, let limits the variable's scope to that block. Note the difference between var, whose scope is inside the function where it is declared.

var a = 1;
var b = 2;

{
  var a = 11; // the scope is global
  let b = 22; // the scope is inside the block

  console.log(a); // 11
  console.log(b); // 22
}

console.log(a); // 11
console.log(b); // 2

However, this combination of var and let declarations below is a SyntaxError because var not being block-scoped, leading to them being in the same scope. This results in an implicit re-declaration of the variable.

let x = 1;

{
  var x = 2; // SyntaxError for re-declaration
}

Specifications

Specification
ECMAScript Language Specification
# sec-let-and-const-declarations

Browser compatibility

BCD tables only load in the browser

See also